{"id":3979,"date":"2023-09-30T13:37:55","date_gmt":"2023-09-30T13:37:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/terracuore.it\/?p=3979"},"modified":"2023-10-01T10:20:01","modified_gmt":"2023-10-01T10:20:01","slug":"quando-un-simbolo-decade-e-viene-riscritto-parte-ii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/terracuore.it\/en\/quando-un-simbolo-decade-e-viene-riscritto-parte-ii\/","title":{"rendered":"When a symbol decays and is rewritten: Part II"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Let us now delve deeper into two or three points that were barely mentioned in the previous article.\nThat is to say:<\/p>\n

1. <\/b>real \u201cmagical\u201d wars have been fought in the past to take power away from people\nopponents, for example by deflecting or blocking their symbols. It is also done in\npresent?<\/p>\n

2. <\/b>there are symbols and forces that do not change and are not diverted as the\ntime? So something that is not a mere human thought form?<\/p>\n

We will delve into these two points in a short while, in the meantime I will make two small clarifications: In the previous article we talked about thought forms and we analysed a\nsymbol is the Ansata Cross or Ankh. And we have observed how it has changed effects\nover time. If you missed it you can find it at this \u00a0When a symbol decays and\nis rewritten: Part I.<\/a><\/span>.<\/b><\/p>\n

In this regard, I am asked whether it is healthy to use the Ankh as a symbol. The answer is\nsimple: Guys, I never said not to use it \u2013 but to know its nature, and\nunderstand what gives them power. This way you will understand if it is right for you\nor not, and in which cases it should be used and in which cases it should not be used.<\/p>\n

I then remind you,r not to believe what I write, but to verify and test it yourself, using any etheric analysis methods of your knowledge.<\/p>\n

However, there is a small precaution to take into consideration when we test a\nsymbol, a drawing, a geometric figure to understand its possible effects. A simple drawing has no etheric effects. It is simply a collection of lines, shapes and colours. The effects arise because it is our personal \"energy\" that activates this symbol. And this opens up the risk that we are the ones who influence the result and create the effect we want to see.<\/p>\n

The hidden risk is precisely that of remaining closely tied to what we create or to what we do\nto whom we give power. This is a lesson that was explained to me when I was a kid\nI was studying\u00a0radionics\u00a0(historic discipline that uses geometric and other designs for healing purposes more modern findings), then confirmed by my personal experiences. If the tool that\nuses, symbol, geometric figure, etc.. it has no effects of its own but you are the one who gives them to it, even if so 1% then this takes from you. Or use you to clean when the instrument field\nit becomes overloaded with ether and dissonant thought forms. If you are trained and fit then\nfunctions, but there is a limit after which your personal life force collapses in the attempt\nsupport all the symbols you have created. This is the often denied sad story of why\nmany operators and even some disciplines (no, I won't name names,so don't ask) have\nenergy drops to say the least.<\/p>\n

However, some symbols and figures somehow carry their own etheric field,\u00a0partially or entirely\u00a0independent of our psychic projections and vital force.<\/p>\n

In the first case we talk about shape wave effect, that is, we say that the drawing has only effects\nif it receives the energy to function from the operator. But we are now interested in the second case, that of\u00a0symbols that have an effect as such.<\/p>\n

And as seen in the previous article, almost all symbols have effects as it is the expression of the thought forms of the culture that created them. So the beings humans can, over time, give symbols the power to generate effects. And these are the expression of what we as human beings have projected over time into those symbols.<\/p>\n

For example, let's take the swastika... If we analyse it, what do we find? Before Nazism it was a symbol of good luck and prosperity. Is it still? This is quite a test from be able to do as the swastika is still widely used in much of the East as a beneficial symbol. Have its effects been overwritten? Have they been diverted or polluted? Has she remained intact? But I repeat, don't answer with your head or with logic instead become neutral observers as much as you can, recognise your desires and impulses they say \"I know - I'm right - it's bound to be like this\" etc.. take all your time\nis needed, and analyse the swastika field to find out.<\/p>\n

Continued\u2026<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Let us now delve deeper into two or three points that were barely mentioned in the previous article.\nThat is to say:<\/p>\n

1. <\/b>real \u201cmagical\u201d wars have been fought in the past to take power away from people\nopponents, for example by deflecting or blocking their symbols. It is also done in\npresent?<\/p>\n

2. <\/b>there are symbols and forces that do not change and are not diverted as the\ntime? So something that is not a mere human thought form?<\/p>\n

We will delve into these two points in a short while, in the meantime I will make two small clarifications: In the previous article we talked about thought forms and we analysed a\nsymbol is the Ansata Cross or Ankh. And we have observed how it has changed effects\nover time. If you missed it you can find it at this \u00a0When a symbol decays and\nis rewritten: Part I.<\/a><\/span>.<\/b><\/p>\n

In this regard, I am asked whether it is healthy to use the Ankh as a symbol. The answer is\nsimple: Guys, I never said not to use it \u2013 but to know its nature, and\nunderstand what gives them power. This way you will understand if it is right for you\nor not, and in which cases it should be used and in which cases it should not be used.<\/p>\n

I then remind you,r not to believe what I write, but to verify and test it yourself, using any etheric analysis methods of your knowledge.<\/p>\n

However, there is a small precaution to take into consideration when we test a\nsymbol, a drawing, a geometric figure to understand its possible effects. A simple drawing has no etheric effects. It is simply a collection of lines, shapes and colours. The effects arise because it is our personal \"energy\" that activates this symbol. And this opens up the risk that we are the ones who influence the result and create the effect we want to see.<\/p>\n

The hidden risk is precisely that of remaining closely tied to what we create or to what we do\nto whom we give power. This is a lesson that was explained to me when I was a kid\nI was studying\u00a0radionics\u00a0(historic discipline that uses geometric and other designs for healing purposes more modern findings), then confirmed by my personal experiences. If the tool that\nuses, symbol, geometric figure, etc.. it has no effects of its own but you are the one who gives them to it, even if so 1% then this takes from you. Or use you to clean when the instrument field\nit becomes overloaded with ether and dissonant thought forms. If you are trained and fit then\nfunctions, but there is a limit after which your personal life force collapses in the attempt\nsupport all the symbols you have created. This is the often denied sad story of why\nmany operators and even some disciplines (no, I won't name names,so don't ask) have\nenergy drops to say the least.<\/p>\n

However, some symbols and figures somehow carry their own etheric field,\u00a0partially or entirely\u00a0independent of our psychic projections and vital force.<\/p>\n

In the first case we talk about shape wave effect, that is, we say that the drawing has only effects\nif it receives the energy to function from the operator. But we are now interested in the second case, that of\u00a0symbols that have an effect as such.<\/p>\n

And as seen in the previous article, almost all symbols have effects as it is the expression of the thought forms of the culture that created them. So the beings humans can, over time, give symbols the power to generate effects. And these are the expression of what we as human beings have projected over time into those symbols.<\/p>\n

For example, let's take the swastika... If we analyse it, what do we find? Before Nazism it was a symbol of good luck and prosperity. Is it still? This is quite a test from be able to do as the swastika is still widely used in much of the East as a beneficial symbol. Have its effects been overwritten? Have they been diverted or polluted? Has she remained intact? But I repeat, don't answer with your head or with logic instead become neutral observers as much as you can, recognise your desires and impulses they say \"I know - I'm right - it's bound to be like this\" etc.. take all your time\nis needed, and analyse the swastika field to find out.<\/p>\n

Continued\u2026<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

<\/div>
<\/div>

Visit the F-Aurea online shop<\/h2><\/div>

in the webshop you will find all the webinars and more<\/p><\/h3><\/div><\/div><\/div>
SHOP ONLINE<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Sign up to receive the latest news<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div>
<\/i><\/span>Thank you, your e-mail address has been communicated correctly.<\/span><\/div>